UNCENSORED BLOG

[kahljorn]

Actually, complex sugars are good for you... it's simple and refined sugars that are bad. See my post in the food forum under dieting crazyness for more information. COMPLEX SUGARS metabolize in a way that's very good for you because it takes longer and there's a lot more usable parts. I think all the parts are usable by the body, whereas with simple and refined sugars you only get a few parts sugar and some leftovers that can't be used.
Although I don't know if I agree with this, I've heard it's better to eat large healthy meals. Especially if you're largest/heaviest healthy meal is for lunch; the digestive process is supposed to work best at noon because of the biological clock deal (that's supposed to be our most active time of the day). A good example of a large healthy meal would be something with a lot of rice, vegetables and beans.
The only problem is that people in america act like fat is bad, when really fat is actually good and very important for protecting the body/keeping it healthy. The problem with it is when it gets extreme - but that's obvious. If you're healthy and a little bit fat it's actually GOOD for you to be a little fat.

American milk actually isn't that good for you anymore because it's pastuerized and all this shit. Milk raises fertility :O i just learned that!

Actually you don't lose the nutrients when you steam vegetables, the nutrients just go into the water. So if you can find a way to use the water you can still get lots of nutrients, or if you cook them in some type of sauce.
Potatoes have the best nutritional value of nearly any vegetable.

the best justification I can think of for eatting meals at lunch is by observing people who work "Graveyard shifts". It's called graveyard for a reason, and that's because it's supposed to be one of the worst hours to work health-wise. So, logically, the body is supposed to be doing certain things at certain times, and when it's not it causes health problems.