Quote:
Originally Posted by ranxer
http://dc.indymedia.org/front.php3?article_id=56078after blowing up those images it looks like the shovel color difference could be from lighting.. i suspect those lights on top raise and lower with the bucket.. if these are the case its just angle and timing that make the bulldozer pictures look fake..
|
Holy shit you're dense. Why would the lights on top raise and lower six inches? Even the ISM have revised their handout to read "This was one of two bulldozers participating in the home demolition operation on the day Rachel was killed." These photos were originally represented as being of the same bulldozer at the same time of day. Why? two different bulldozers, at two different times of day in front of TWO different horizons. Additionally, the shot showing her after the injury, the 3rd photo has much more daylight than the 2nd photo which is supposed to be BEFORE the 3rd photo.
Where is the mound of earth Rachel clambered up and was buried in? The woman shown lying bleeding from her nose and mouth is lying on a flat piece of ground, and she's not covered in sand. The photos of the friends seem posed. Hardly a frantic digging in motion of air of panic can be seen. There is also the issue of the photos having two different photographers, and time/date stamps on some and not others.
Quote:
Maybe Rachel didnt know who the hell lived in those homes but that they were illegally being dozed over so was there with others out of principal.
|
Hey, maybe she should have looked into it further before putting her life on the line then...and maybe revitioniss like yourself shouldn't attempt to capatilize on her death so it wasn't in "vain" ? Gosh Ranxer, why worry that she died in vain when she was acting as a human shield for a cause she believed a noble one?
International law says "the defending side is allowed to demolish enemies firing and fighting postions in order to prevent future or current warfare".