Quote:
Originally Posted by Gabby GaGa
I noticed a pattern of argument that's consistant - with both internet and non internet subjects.
The internet subject is interesting. Say, for example, that I take two people of equal intelligence, one on the machine and one in-person. The internet subject does better because they're presented with an opportunity to structure their arguments, and disect the entire idea.
|
First, let me remind you that internet debates involve writing.
Then let me present to you the philosophical seminars of ancient Greece and the point-counterpoint literary pamphlets from the Restoration Period (or hell, any piece written before the internet). Both styles of argument fully allow structuring of arguments and the ability to dissect the entire idea, while Athenian person-on-person stylings actually having a larger emphasis on it.
Basically, you fail at the internet.
Quote:
you can find my next book, which will contain parts of this transcript, in August 2007 at Borders bookstores and other propriators of liturature. The title is Vintage Ideals and Lost Systems.
stay tuned.
more to come.
|
Despite the 100% chance that you're bullshitting, I'm actually hoping that I see your book someday.
Threaded Mode
