Go Back   I-Mockery Forum > I-Mockery Discussion Forums > Philosophy, Politics, and News
FAQ Members List Calendar Today's Posts

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Preechr Preechr is offline
=======
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: NA
Preechr is probably a spambot
Old Mar 12th, 2007, 02:25 PM       
*sigh*

Max, I know you know this because we discussed it already. Richard Armitage was the one that "outed" Plame, if anybody, and Fitzpatrick KNEW that before the hearings began. This was simply a witch-hunt for process crimes from the beginning. Maybe they were looking for tips of your larger iceburgs, but if all they could come up with to that end was contradictory testimony that highlighted other contradictory testimony, why are you so proud to call this a victory? This is no where near on the same level as Sandy Berger, whom I know you disapproved of yet didn't use to paint the Clinton Royal Family red with the blood of innocent babies...

In answer to your question: I don't know. I think Bush "allowed" the investigations to prove they'd done nothing wrong, and the perjury charge was an unforeseen complication. I think they already know whether or not they can do it, and have already figured out what they're gonna do in any case. Probably has something to do with the appeals process and how that goes down.
__________________
mburbank~ Yes, okay, fine, I do know what you meant, but why is it not possible for you to get through a paragraph without making all the words cry?

How can someone who obviously thinks so much of their ideas have so little respect for expressing them? How can someone who so yearns to be taken seriously make so little effort?!
Reply With Quote
  #2  
mburbank mburbank is offline
The Moxie Nerve Food Tonic
mburbank's Avatar
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: right behind you
mburbank has disabled reputation
Old Mar 13th, 2007, 09:27 AM       
Why Berger wasn't charged is beyond me. Since the lstt time we talked about him, I've read more and he should be in jail, there is no question about it at all.

as far as "Richard Armitage was the one that "outed" Plame"
1.) Richard Armitage was one of the people who outed Plame. So did several others including Libby.
2.) The charges were obstruction of justice and perjury. Those are crimes. Even if it was entrapment, which I think is a stretch, since at very least it was entrapment for lying about what they actually would have liked to charge him with, it is a crime. When Clinton lied about cigar shenanigans while being questioned about real estate shenanigans, it was a crime. Senior government officials commit crimes all the time I'm sure. But like cops, soldiers and superheros, they should accept the risks that come with the territory.
3.) Al Capone was 'entrapped' and found guilty of tax evasion. While it's my least preferred method of prosecution, I still don't think Capone would be in line for a Presidential pardon. And before you ask, I think the 'gang' that 'Scooter' is a part of is responsible for a whole lot more dead people than Capone.

Ironically, I believe it was on 'Baretta' that the phrase 'Don't do the crime if you can't do the time' was coined.
Reply With Quote
Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

   


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:18 AM.


© 2008 I-Mockery.com
Powered by: vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.