Quote:
Originally Posted by Geggy
You're right, they're not technically the us government but many of the members of PNAC have jobs or, at least used to, with the US government which was one of the reasons it made it easier for PNAC to implement their plans to overthrow undesired soveriegnity governments, including Iraq and Iran, and install those who would comply with their plans to provide security and stability, to militarize space, and to form one world governemnt.
|
Which page is that in the document? Could you point it out to me? Thanks.
Quote:
You can't deny the group has heavy influence on US's policy decision making.
|
Uhh, yeah, I can do it pretty easily. You make a pretty poor case for it to begin with, and you've otherwise provided no solid argument that they are anything more than a dumb think tank. That's all they are.
Quote:
I don't see how it is inane to assume along with the naval build up by the US and britian, that they're setting up their own people and the iranians for the kidnappings to occur and use it as the provacation to further PNAC's plans.
|
Well let me tell you how it's inane:
1. You have absolutely NO proof that this is what they've done, and infact admit to it later on in your post.
2. You have yet to show us where PNAC even states these plans; and
3. Your middle friggin name is INANE. Not only does your argument have no credibility, but YOU have absolutely no credibility here. If you think your arguments are so damn sound, you had better do a better job of supportin them.
Quote:
Either way because of the naval build up by the us and brits on the gulf of iran which may appear as a threat to the iranians, can you blame them for the kidnappings?
|
Ok, so here you drop your silly attempt to turn this into a ridiculous conspiracy, and simply show your allegiance to all things anti-American.
YES, I can blame them for it, because it violates international law if they took them in Iraqi waters. The British had been doing those routine sweeps, under UN approval, for months. This was a premeditated attempt to create an international incident, and you damn well know it.
Quote:
Surely the US would have done the same if it was the other way around, that if iran was building up along the coast of either atlantic or pacific ocean.
|
But that hasn't happened, in fact this was a violation of international law against the BRITISH, so let's try to focus champ.
Quote:
What do you think of the videos in which three or so of the british personnels who have confessed being in the iranian waters and apologize? Do you think it's legit or are they trying to weasel their way out of the hole by complying with the irnaians?[
|
I first off think it's hysterical that a dumbass such as you, who doesnt trust video footage of Osama Bin Laden, and who thinks video footage of the Pentagon on 9/11 is altered by the government, takes these video confessions at face value. it just goes to show that all your talk about being a "truth seeker" is simply cowardice and a show to cover up what's nothing more than good old fashioned anti-Americanism. You hate your country, and will take the word of ANYBODY else over them.
And speaking of cowardice, I'd love to see how you wet your pants in the situation those sailors are in, while you try to "weasel" your way out in order to "comply" with the Iranians. I'd give you about 10 seconds before you went native and were praising Allah, you little toad.
NO, I don't pay any credence to those confessions. I disregard them, just as I disregard 99.9% of the things you say.
Quote:
At least to me their confessions are more believable than khalid sheikh mohammad's confession since it wasn't videotaped and aired to the public for them to see.
|
You are a moron.