Go Back   I-Mockery Forum > I-Mockery Discussion Forums > Philosophy, Politics, and News
FAQ Members List Calendar Today's Posts

 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #4  
Preechr Preechr is offline
=======
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: NA
Preechr is probably a spambot
Old Apr 19th, 2007, 08:01 PM       
I agree that gun control should not be the central discussion surrounding the Virginia Tech shootings. The two things have no bearing on each other.

On that note:

"A well regulated militia being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the People to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed."

It says right there that there was always supposed to be a relationship between gun ownership and regulation. In order to guarantee this certain necessity, we have established an inviable right to, in some way, have guns. The necessity referenced was a well regulated militia, not a nation of lone gunmen, loose cannons and vigilantes. If the Founders felt angry, armed mobs were necessary to the security of a Free State, they would have said so.
__________________
mburbank~ Yes, okay, fine, I do know what you meant, but why is it not possible for you to get through a paragraph without making all the words cry?

How can someone who obviously thinks so much of their ideas have so little respect for expressing them? How can someone who so yearns to be taken seriously make so little effort?!
Reply With Quote
 



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

   


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:47 AM.


© 2008 I-Mockery.com
Powered by: vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.