You frighten me sometimes, kahl.
On a technical point, the Supreme Court didn't ban anything. They simply upheld the Constitutionality of a law passed by Congress against a "practice" overwhelmingly rejected by most Americans.
As for how "ass backwards" our Supreme Court is--I think we should be careful about dismissing the Court for the sake of the whims of popular medicine. In the early 20th Century, a healthy portion of the medical community, and over 3/4 of the states, thought eugenic policies like criminal sterilizations made sense. Despite its popular usage, the Supreme Court
unanimously rejected these procedures in 1942, dismissing their constitutionality.
Your real gripe here should be with Congress (including the hypocritical Democrats who voted for the PBA ban and then cried about this decision). And derrida, I think you make a fair point towards the tail end here. I think most folks have a different understanding of what this procedure actually is...I mean, who wants to crush a baby's skull on the way out? It sounds absolutely barbaric, or as Moynihan put it, it's like "infanticide." But to my understnading, it isn't really that simple, and yes, Congress limited the flexibility of abortion doctors (

) to keep the procedures as non-invasive as possible. But perhaps our I-Mockery residents could elaborate more on that.