|
|
|
Member
|
 |
|
|
|
Oct 28th, 2007, 12:48 PM
what's so unreasonable about expecting a timber company to perform preventative maintenance on stocks of land so as to prevent loss of those resources? the government spending money to do things which should be done by the private sector? sounds like socialism to me.
forest thinning is necessary as it stands but only because natural burn cycles have been disrupted.
|
__________________
| |
|
|
Threaded Mode
