Go Back   I-Mockery Forum > I-Mockery Discussion Forums > Philosophy, Politics, and News
FAQ Members List Calendar Today's Posts

 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #8  
punkgrrrlie10 punkgrrrlie10 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
punkgrrrlie10 is probably a spambot
Old Apr 28th, 2003, 08:31 PM       
Alot of the disenfranchisement stuff is so that enemy combatants and such aren't accorded the same due process as a citizen is.

Some of these include, right to an attorney, speedy trial, double jeopardy...ya know all the fun Bill of Rights stuff. When I read the recent enemy combatants case, the circuit court made it a really limited interpretation of its application. But at this point, people are being wary so as not to enrage too many people.

I think it would have to eventually get to the Supreme Court but I have no idea how it would come out. With the current make-up of Justices, it all comes down to O'Conner and/or Kennedy.
Reply With Quote
 



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

   


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:10 PM.


© 2008 I-Mockery.com
Powered by: vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.