Go Back   I-Mockery Forum > I-Mockery Discussion Forums > Philosophy, Politics, and News
FAQ Members List Calendar Today's Posts

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Dr. Boogie Dr. Boogie is offline
Funky Dynamite
Dr. Boogie's Avatar
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Help, I'm lost!
Dr. Boogie is probably pretty okDr. Boogie is probably pretty okDr. Boogie is probably pretty okDr. Boogie is probably pretty ok
Old Feb 5th, 2008, 01:36 PM       
So really, KK, what you're saying is that you're in favor of gay marriage.


Seriously, though, you're a monster hypocrite. Like Jeanette said, you did the deed outside of wedlock, so straight away, you're on the same level as gay people. You've also committed the sin of bestiality, so that drops you down another peg. We can see in this thread and your overlong thread about your subconcious that you're suffering from a major case of vanity, so that's another step backward. The drinking and fighting were good too, so I'd say that puts you way below the people you condemn on the Staircase of Sin.

You might as well start look for a timeshare in the Stygian Abyss, my friend.
__________________
Dr. Boogie: Everything is so simple when you have a rocket launcher for an arm!


Reply With Quote
  #2  
mburbank mburbank is offline
The Moxie Nerve Food Tonic
mburbank's Avatar
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: right behind you
mburbank has disabled reputation
Old Feb 5th, 2008, 02:37 PM       
Totally going to hell. Totally going to get homo sexed by boy demons.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
derrida derrida is offline
Member
derrida's Avatar
Join Date: Sep 2003
derrida is probably a spambot
Old Feb 5th, 2008, 04:52 PM       
So, this piece really should be more accurately titled "the case against sexuality," as you are not so much attacking homosexuality per se but the concept of sex for its own sake.

When you talk about the people who should feel consisigned to celibacy I can only assume that you are talking about that subset of homosexuals who are basically born queers. Like so utterly effeminate that no account of "socialization" could ever possibly account for just how fucking GAY they are. I know it's tempting to label them "diseased," and even if you wanna seriously look at human souls as existing in a hierarchy defined by darwinian fitness you can't argue against the utilitarian benefits of dykes and fags, and the unique skills they bring to society. You say fucking for comfort is cool, so if they wanna fuck eachother for comfort in healthy mutually supportive relationships, what's so bad about that?
__________________
Reply With Quote
Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

   


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:21 PM.


© 2008 I-Mockery.com
Powered by: vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.