So, you are saying thousands and thousands of people are behind this in order for your scenario to be real?
Quote:
|
911 commission credibility has already been shot and they currently have dubious reputation.
|
Only according to you and your ilk.
Quote:
|
As time has unravelled, we're finding out more that all of the agencies you have listed above have either lied to the commission and withheld crucial documents
|
No, we aren't. We are finding that some bureaucrats were playing CYA at the time. And that was mostly FBI and CIA. There is nothing in there accusing anyone of intentionality allowing the 9/11 attacks to happen.
Quote:
|
Even lee hamilton admitted the commission was set up by bush and cheney to fail.
|
Why don't you people ever finish his statement? He says they were set up to fail, but they did succeed.
Quote:
-Morgan Stanley Dean Witter & Co, which occupied 22 floors of the World Trade Centre, saw 2,157 of its October $45 put options bought in the three trading days before September 11. This is against an average of 27 contracts per day before September 6. Morgan Stanley's share price fell from $48.90 to $42.50 after the attacks. Assuming that 2,000 of these options contracts had been bought based on knowledge of the impending attacks, their purchasers could have profited by at least $1.2 million.
-Merrill Lynch & Co, which also occupied 22 floors of the World Trade Centre, saw 12,215 October series $45 put option bought in the four trading days before attacks, a 1,200 per cent jump from the average trade volume of about 250 contracts a day. When trading resumed, Merrill's shares fell from $46.88 to $41.50. Assuming that 11,000 option contracts had been bought by 'insiders,' their profit would have been $5.5 million.
|
*sigh*
Quote:
|
I am not denying that 9/11 was an evil act perpetrated towards the US. I'm just not buying the white house's version of the story.
|
You're not buying the story backed by the evidence, either. You seem to buy the story that makes for the best spy novel.
Threaded Mode
