Future of Democracy

[Helm]

Anarchy = complete and utter chaos where there are no rules and it is possible that bands of people could join together to try and have some sort of rule for their localized groups

Moronic drivel. Read some Cropotkin and Bakunin before you voice an oppinion on what Anarchy is. It's interesting that you think you're in the position to dictate terms to people like Rorschach.

As far as I know, Greece was a democracy, Rome was a republic. The issue of Greece's democracy is complicated by the fact that their concept of citizenry was more stringent than ours, but still.

Slaves. Thus, not a true democracy. But it is pretty complicated, and the conversation just skimmed over this issue, so I'll leave it alone.

Democracy is dangerous because the minority is never protected. Even is 500,001 want something and 499,999 don't, the minority opinion does not matter. Kinda like anarchy but with a fancier name.

Not every democratical ruling rests upon a marginal majority, fuckwit. Fuckwit. I just want to say that again. Fuckwit. Rolls of the tongue, it does. Fuckwit.