War, the world's only hygiene

[Kulturkampf]

Blah blah blah blah blah.

War is necessary to kill off the lesser developed, moronic societies and to purify the nation of shitty governments.

People get traumatized and fucked up but in my time in the Army I have also met a lot of guys who revelled in their time in the sandbox.

[The Leader]

Originally Posted by Kulturkampf

War is necessary to kill off the lesser developed, moronic societies and to purify the nation of shitty governments.

Oh, wow.

[Grislygus]

Blatant idiocy from intellectually crippled guttertrash, marginally moving up from his career as an unparalleled drunkard only to learn nothing. Fantastic.

[Kulturkampf]

Originally Posted by Grislygus

Blatant idiocy from intellectually crippled guttertrash, marginally moving up from his career as an unparalleled drunkard only to learn nothing. Fantastic.

I am still a drunkard. And still unparalleled.

The only difference now is that I have shifted focuses, I guess.

Tell me...

Why shouldn't Ba'athists be massacred and a democracy set up?

Why shouldn't Mugabe be fucking dead already?

[derrida]

Originally Posted by Zhukov

Yes, hygiene, but uh, what? Is it a population control idea? Weeding out the weak for the strong?

I guess that's the idea, but the problem is the strong don't always win.

[Zhukov]

Do the strong ever win? I mean really win?

I don't think you weed out the weak through destruction, I think the better way to weed out the weak would be through education.

Killing the "weak" leaves nothing but an army of malleable soldiers or frightened civilians wiling to say/do whatever it took to not be seen as weak. Hardly Strong, in my eyes.

[VaporTrailx1]

Usually the strong (elite units and those most willing to fight) are pretty much wiped out in the beginning stages of the war. At least that was the case in both World Wars. You're pretty much left with rookies and unwilling draftees towards the end.

It's pretty much counter-productive in that sense.