Wolfowitz admits the Iraq war was about oil

[mburbank]

Actually, I'm returning to an old isuue, ie. that you can't 99% of the chit that tumbles out of your chow hole any better than your submarine letter.

"Oh! What am I you Jewjewjew, a Lexus?!? When I claim something outrageous and thupid you need to prove it for m,e or that I am wrong of it you jew!"
-Vinth.

But. While I do think the Guardian should have included the entire context of the quote, I don't think it changes the picture very much. All it does is allow Wolfowitz to ignore the economic straights Iraq was in by saying they had a natural resource the North Koreans did not, and acting as if that changes the moral, political picture. Our options in economically strangling the North Koreans are greater than the ones we had in Iraq, but we'd done a fairly good job of impovrishing the general populace all the same. I think if the difference between the two is oil, than you can't say this war had nothing to do with oil. And including pieces of quotes without the entire article is hardly a lie. It's the stock and trade of your #1 ruth raated source, Vinth. And before you disagree, I remind you, a study hs shown I am always right.