So if you're attacking global warming "from the left", then how come you're using a spectacularly dense argument that I've seen used, VERBATIM, by Glenn Beck, Sean Hannity, and Bill O'Reilly on their respective programs in the last month alone?
GEE DA SCIENTISTS SAID DAT OVERADUNDANT CARBON AND DUH CO2 LEVELS CAN THEORETICALLY AID IN THE DEVELOPMENT OF LONG-TERM NEGATIVE CONSEQUENCES. THEY MUST BE CLAIMING DAT ITS UH POLLUTANT HUH HUH HUH WHAT A BUNCH OF TOOLS
Threaded Mode
