Global Warming

[TheCoolinator]

I think we should all be asking ourselves why the Global Warmer community (Privately funded) would want to demonize a benign gas like CO2.

How I see it is that they wish to criminalize the gas in the mind of the public. Their mode of operation is to throw out an emotionally charged ideology (End of the World Scenario), mainly focused at the youth to create a synthetic mass movement. Some call them little enforcers. The high priests (climatologists) of this movement are promoted by a quasi-governmental body referred to as the IPCC.

The IPCC does not carry out its own original research, nor does it do the work of monitoring climate or related phenomena itself. A main activity of the IPCC is publishing special reports on topics relevant to the implementation of the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC)

http://www.ipcc.ch/pdf/ipcc-principles/ipcc-principles.pdf

This group of unaccountable, unelected individuals decides by decrees which work of literature will be favorable to the cause of global warming and which ones are not (I.E. Censoring, Omittingm Ridiculing). The main thrust or agenda behind this synthetic movement is to create a Carbon Tax based around CO2. By doing this they will have an unending supply of revenue coming from the countries paying into it. The Carbon Tax will be on everything. Literally. It will be on any product that is created through using energy. This is an austerity tax. This is a tax created to destroy what’s left of industry while driving down the standard of living for the people. All under the guise of "Saving the Planet, polar bear, island nation, etc, etc,".

They understand that as cynical, desensitized, and callous people are these days there is an inherit goodness about them willing to make sacrifices for the future of humanity. If they are able to channel this energy through institutionalized irrationality then their plans will come to fruition. As an added bonus they wish to also pass a Cap and Trade system to officially "cut carbon emissions" but unofficially it will further destroy industry while propping up a speculative market on CO2. The Carbon Credit scheme will be similar to the pollution credits of old, bigger more powerful polluters will be allowed to pollute as much as they please as long as they buy / trade the credits legally on the open market, all the while having wall street parasites driving up the price of carbon to further pauperize the public.

It's an ingenious and insidious plan. That's why people have stood up in the face of adversity and spoke out against the mass manipulation.

31,486 American scientists have signed this petition,including 9,029 with PhDs

http://www.petitionproject.org/

This one is for TheLeader because I know he loves the Peer-reviewed stuff.

Summary of Peer-Reviewed Research
http://www.petitionproject.org/review_article.php

[Zhukov]

It may well be an ingenious and insidious plan, but does the existence of such a plan refute that climate change is actually happening?

I am a big proponent of 'find out who benefits most' etc, but that by itself doesn't mean anything. It's all well and good that you've shown us that people are exploiting the 'climate change movement', but does it automatically follow that the climate change movement is based on faulty science, or lies?


Oh, and are you saying that climatologists should be elected?

[TheCoolinator]

Originally Posted by Zhukov

It may well be an ingenious and insidious plan, but does the existence of such a plan refute that climate change is actually happening?

The changing of the climate is a natural cycle unaffected by Mankind. As I said previously, They own and operate the man made global warming hypothesis. Meaning it's been a fabrication from the beginning.

but does it automatically follow that the climate change movement is based on faulty science, or lies?

As I said above, the "movement" is completely sythetic. It's a ruling class ideology that has been forced upon emotionally fragile individuals who have no knowledge of past climate patterns. If you scroll up a bit you will see a chart and a quote that both point out that in certain parts of history CO2 levels were 10x as high and the earth was not warming. The chart also shows that even when CO2 levels drop the global temperature stays the same.

Oh, and are you saying that climatologists should be elected?

No, I'm just pointing out that the IPCC is a unaccountable agency that was created to prope up the myth of man made global warming.

[Zhukov]

Originally Posted by TheCoolinator

The changing of the climate is a natural cycle unaffected by Mankind. As I said previously, They own and operate the man made global warming hypothesis. Meaning it's been a fabrication from the beginning.

That's not an affirmative or a negative in response to my question. Does the existence of whomever you are toting as the 'they' at this stage "owning" the global warming hypothesis actually prove the non-existence of global warming on a scientific level?

If, as I, and logic, suspects, the answer is no; then please stop using "The ruling class is making a mint out of the global warming lie" as an argument against the existence of global warming.

The ruling class owning the 'Climate Change Movement' =/= Climate change is not happening.

[VaporTrailx1]

Raising CO2 levels in the ocean are what we should be worried about. It has far more devastating effects than global warming.

[TheCoolinator]

Originally Posted by VaporTrailx1

Raising CO2 levels in the ocean are what we should be worried about. It has far more devastating effects than global warming.

Yes,

Ocean acidification is messing up all the reefs and shellfish populations. One more reason we should of been moving to renewable energy sources. I feel like these oil and coal cartels have been halting Human progress for over half a century.