Global Warming

[Colonel Flagg]

Originally Posted by Coolie

I would say that having zero Climatologists gives the petition more validity. Most of your Climatologists are probably taking hand outs from some privately funded Global Warming foundation that pushes the myth. That's why all of their work is either falsified or just blatantly wrong. They are paid to find Global Warming no matter what; they have been given the conclusion to their study before it even starts and they are forced through monetary incentives to manipulate the data to prove it. It's what they call in the field.....Bad Science.

Coolie, you just don't get it, do you? "All of their work is either falsified or just blatantly wrong." Really? In what peer-reviewed journal have you seen this information?

In fact, only a fraction of the data has been found to be misrepresented, and even when that has been corrected and taken into account, the correlation between CO2 increasing and OVERALL global warming remains valid. It is not refutable by anyone literate in the scientific community. Again, not to sound like a broken record, but the major sticking point between the skeptics and the proponents of AGW in the scientific community is that of CAUSALITY. There is no believing or denying, except among those who have no real knowledge.

You claim the climatologists are "probably taking hand outs from some privately funded Global Warming foundation" - Which foundation? Which climatologists? You can't provide any examples, besides internet links to blogs and op-ed pieces. Yet you BELIEVE it to be true. (How ironic of you.)

You call this all "Bad Science".

Supe is right, you sound like member of the creationist movement. And, unfortunately, I'm being as objective as I can be.

[TheCoolinator]

The cooling and warming of the globe is a natural cycle that we do not affect. You're attempting to take a well documented climate cycle and load it down with myths. Please differentiate between fact and fiction. Please answer the questions above.

the correlation between CO2 increasing and OVERALL global warming remains valid

^ I understand your meaning behind correlation and causation but their ideology has and always will fall into the categories of Myths and Legends. Furthermore, there is a graph only a few posts backs that completely debunks this and underneath that same graph is a quote from an article that backs up that point.

You claim the climatologists are "probably taking hand outs from some privately funded Global Warming foundation" - Which foundation? Which climatologists? You can't provide any examples, besides internet links to blogs and op-ed pieces. Yet you BELIEVE it to be true. (How ironic of you.)

The IPCC is in blatant collusion with foundations that fund Climatologists that agree with Man Made Global Warming. They only publish scientists that believe in the myth and most of them have been found incorrect.

........

Originally Posted by Colonel Flagg

you sound like member of the creationist movement.

Speaking of irony,

Did anyone else slightly chuckle at the allegation of me having the same mind set as Creationists while zealously being called a Heretic for not bowing before the altar of Man Made Global Warming.

Like John Coleman said on that filthy show Red Eye.....it has truly become an religion.