Go Back   I-Mockery Forum > I-Mockery Discussion Forums > Philosophy, Politics, and News
FAQ Members List Calendar Today's Posts

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
TheCoolinator TheCoolinator is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Mean Streets of New York
TheCoolinator is probably a spambot
Old Mar 24th, 2010, 03:00 PM       
Quote:
Originally Posted by Zhukov View Post
The only bad thing about this plan was that ordinary working families were going to end up paying more than the polluting corporations.
Isn't that what I've been saying all along? Can't we agree that this hoax was meant to do this from the beginning. Make the ordinary people pay? Come on Zhukov, your so close.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Zhukov View Post
It was shelved for political, and economical reasons. French companies were going to be put at a disadvantage compared to their German counterparts, who wouldn't be paying the tax.
Once again. That's the POINT. Drive down wages, industry, and allow 3rd world countries to pollute as much as they want. It's austerity for you. Not wallstreet.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Zhukov View Post
There was no "struggle" here, except for the continual attempts to make you see logic and reason.
Wrong,

There were TONS and TONS of Union strikes. It pretty much shut the whole country down. General strikes = struggle.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Zhukov Zhukov is offline
Supa Soviet Missil Mastar
Zhukov's Avatar
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Tasmania
Zhukov has joined BAPE's armyZhukov has joined BAPE's armyZhukov has joined BAPE's armyZhukov has joined BAPE's armyZhukov has joined BAPE's armyZhukov has joined BAPE's armyZhukov has joined BAPE's armyZhukov has joined BAPE's army
Old Mar 24th, 2010, 03:14 PM       
The strikes were because the workers were going to end up paying more than the corporations, because they were going to hurt the French economy, because more jobs would be lost when French manufacturers closed down and moved to Germany/China. Not because of the inherent lie of carbon pollution. There was no struggle by climate change detractors.

Quote:
France's biggest union, the CGT, said 180 protest marches were planned across the country.

"The issue is getting new direction in economic and social policies," said CGT leader Bernard Thibault, calling on Sarkozy to chart a new course in tackling unemployment and falling living standards.
http://www.google.com/hostednews/afp...vZopu3B562kpOA



There was no debate about the validity of climate change, and there was no 'victory' for the Climate Change Hoax whatever the fuck you would call yourselves collectively - it's gone back to the drawing board and discussions are planned.
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Colonel Flagg Colonel Flagg is offline
after enough bourbon ...
Colonel Flagg's Avatar
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Philadelphia
Colonel Flagg has joined BAPE's armyColonel Flagg has joined BAPE's armyColonel Flagg has joined BAPE's armyColonel Flagg has joined BAPE's armyColonel Flagg has joined BAPE's armyColonel Flagg has joined BAPE's armyColonel Flagg has joined BAPE's armyColonel Flagg has joined BAPE's army
Old Mar 24th, 2010, 03:42 PM       
As I am an elitist pig, I thought I would correct the obvious grammar and syntax errors in Coolie's last post:

Quote:
Originally Posted by TheCoolinator View Post
Isn't that what I've been saying all along? Can't we agree that this hoax was meant to do this from the beginning[1]. Make the ordinary people pay?[2] Come on Zhukov, your [3]so close.
1 - The punctuation should be a question mark, not a period.
2 - This is awkward in context - consider a revision.
3 - Incorrect usage of the pronoun for the contraction.

Quote:
Originally Posted by TheCoolinator View Post
Once again. That's the POINT. Drive down wages, industry, and allow 3rd world countries to pollute as much as they want. It's austerity for you. Not wallstreet. [4]
4 - This paragraph is fragmentary and choppy. Consider a revision.

Quote:
Originally Posted by TheCoolinator View Post
There were TONS and TONS of Union strikes [5]. It pretty much shut the whole country down. [6] General strikes = struggle. [7]
5 - The word "tons" implies mass, not quantity. You should use the word "many". Also, using "tons" twice is redundant.
6 - The sentence subject should agree with the plural to which it refers.
7 - This is phrased awkwardly. Consider a revision.

I feel very bourgeois now.
__________________
The future is fun,
The future is fair.
You may already have won!
You may already be there.
Reply With Quote
Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

   


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:20 AM.


© 2008 I-Mockery.com
Powered by: vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.