Bad news for liberals.

[ranxer]

the controversies arent settled, i believe what i said isnt proven false yet.. unless you only scratch the surface.

we had been warned about pearle harbor at high levels a half a dozen times before the attacks. the rationale was that if we didnt have a first strike by the enemy we wouldnt have the people behind getting into the war.

i think one reason we don't see much reporting of the truth around pearle is that the victor writes the history in so many ways.

maybe youve seen the reports before and brush them off, but i do not, for the tactic of getting americans hurt to drive a war machine is tried and fully successful.. our government has documents that are top secret still regarding pearle. what about the orders to send first aid workers and supplies just prior to the attack to sit on the west coast? it must not be true then that some report the CIA Director Allen Dulles told of the warnings they receieved in mid nov? I'd love to get to the bottom of the many reports that have fallen out of the history books.

the reasons im partial to believing some of the allegations is because we've seen it before.. unclassified documents now tell stories of the corporate crimminals in our government ready to sacrifice americans to get support for invasions.. its a well oiled technique. granted this isnt unique to america, but this is the country that spends My taxes.

hey zero, there's other opinions about the japan consensus after the first bomb dropped. i understand that there are a majority of sources that say they wounldnt surrender.. being unsatisfied with the reported history and distrusting everything a corporate capitalist does/says sucks, i really wish our administrations werent so criminal. if i find anything yall might find interesting ill link it when i have time.

Vince your insults don't help anyone think about anything but degeneracy