Go Back   I-Mockery Forum > I-Mockery Discussion Forums > Philosophy, Politics, and News
FAQ Members List Calendar Today's Posts

 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #4  
The_Rorschach The_Rorschach is offline
Mocker
The_Rorschach's Avatar
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: WestPac
The_Rorschach is probably a spambot
Old Aug 8th, 2003, 04:49 PM       
The honest answer will be somewhat disappointing unfortunately:

I'm simply not sure.

Both, the the second act is far more potentially dangerous, allow the government indiscrete powers. . .But the ability to declare wars which will be fought by others without consent of the people, is also an indiscrete power. The potential for massive collateral damage, in terms of life and property, is greater now than at any point in recorded history. Both Hobbes and Locke agreed the most basic right is the right to life, therefore protecting the innocents from unwarranted and undeserved death should be the governments most important duty. .

.But at what cost? Shall we now sacrifice freedom for security, as our Forefathers have warned us against, Mister Franklin in particular? I dislike the bills, but I cannot help but acknowledge they are necessary considering the world's political climate. . .But God help us when the day comes that another Nero comes to power.

That possibilities frightens me far more than any loss of life due to isolated terrorist strikes.
Reply With Quote
 



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

   


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:29 AM.


© 2008 I-Mockery.com
Powered by: vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.