Adamsite

[Gabby GaGa]

I'm getting a good fucking laugh out of watching you all squirm, you just dripping with akward retaliations that aren't backed up by much more then a high school opinon and a bong full of ganja.

Silly me. All this time I've been searching for a person with whom I can share mutual respect and trust, when instead I should've been looking for a man to order me around.

Don't you want to be ordered around? After all, how would a dumb broad such as yourself get through life any other way?

I don't really need full trust in my man. Trust = predictable, a crime I never hope my man to be guilty of. I want to wonder what he has waiting.
Respect? I respect the man that has the 'nads to control my wild behavior.

Time to explore the regressive happenings of J. Xs mind:

As opposed to preventing him from making a fucked-up decision which will negatively effect you both by stepping in and offering input.

Refer to middle of thread. Observe my opinion proffessing that women only provide input, thus contolling the male. Controll the male, and still be unnaccountable. Sounds like a cushy deal.... Oh...wait...here come the the Feminazies!

s not true. I just covered an in depth history project on Women's suffrage, and it was only a very small percentage of the upper class women (who never had to do anything) that didn't want the vote, and to be equal to men. When the war came, it was a miracle for women, because they were finally allowed to work - they could finally be independant, and ear their own wages. What you are saying is just your own personal opinion, which is shared by about 1% of the ultimate population.

According to... a high school textbook? Again, see above answer concerning emotion controll.

Fetish: Having an extreme fixation, usually sexually satisfying on something.

You mean, like, sexually satisfied by control? Control by a dominating man?

Apparently Gabby is now the spokeswoman for all women who lived before feminism. Why don't you look into the history of your own tribe, the Apache, and learn about the female warriors and leaders in your tribe? Or do you think that all the traditional Apache women were submissive and worshipped on pedestals? I'd like to hear how much (or more likely, how little) you know about your own (alleged) heritage.

Very few apache women were warriors, with little evidence to sustain this. This was more of an amazonian myth combined witht he european perception of the "inferior and uncivalized native"
The europeans also recorded that a vast number of natives were regular cannibals.
Yeah, THAT turned out to be a correct assumption.

Nope, there are absolutely no left-leaning white activists whatsoever who have any sympathies with Mexican immigrants. Not one. No sirree

Turn on the telivison and observe the floods of anti-imigration activists. And the paltery amount of people against it.

And Kahl, I'm no longer reading your responses because you're the type of person who beats a subject like a dead-red-headed horse stepchild with circular and repetive argument.
My god, say something new.

[kahljorn]

SUBJECTS RESPONSE AFTER EXPOSED TO CIRCULAR ARGUMENTS THAT SHE CANT DEFEAT BECAUSE SHE IS DUMB:
"I'm no longer reading your responses because you're the type of person who beats a subject like a dead-red-headed horse stepchild with circular and repetive argument.
My god, say something new. "



GUESS YOU FAILED THE EXPERIMENT YOU CANT KEEP UP ANYMORE DONT FORGET TO PUT THIS IN YOUR BOOK

This thread (in the later part), was my failed attempt at an experiment. I'm doing a study on human observence and reaction to pseudo-intellect.
my point in the study is to prove that when you back a seemingly intelligent person into a corner,
they'll fall apart from the effects of circular arument. Kahl was meant as the intellegent subject. However, his reaction is a bit different then I expected.

7 out of 10 of my subjects were perfectly intelligent and well educated people,
however, I found that when I present them with a roundabout argument, they eventually break down.

ps haven't you been talking about women being subservient bitches the entire time and repeating yourself.. yes. so why dont you get something new, because we've already refuted all of your arguments.
I just talked about simone debeauvour not that i expect you to know who you are why dont we talk about that you just keep talking about how they are subservient but when someone says something otherwise you can't refute it at all or use your brain.

anyway this argument has been over since it began you are a horrible arguer so quit acting like yo u're winning or something everyone knows you're trying to save face.

[kahljorn]

where's the results to that experiment? you never sent them to me.

[arg_zombies]

Originally Posted by Gabby GaGa

I'm getting a good fucking laugh out of watching you all squirm, you just dripping with akward retaliations that aren't backed up by much more then a high school opinon and a bong full of ganja.

And you are answering with fully backed up answers? I'd like to see the day.

Originally Posted by Gabby GaGa

Don't you want to be ordered around? After all, how would a dumb broad such as yourself get through life any other way?

If I were you, I would not be trying to insult someone who is making more sense than you, you are just digging yourself a little, shitty hole to die in.

Originally Posted by Gabby GaGa

I don't really need full trust in my man. Trust = predictable, a crime I never hope my man to be guilty of. I want to wonder what he has waiting.
Respect? I respect the man that has the 'nads to control my wild behavior.

Oh shut up, seriously. Only submissive nuts who can't do anything themselves are like that. In other words, you are now coming across as some weird sex slave who thinks it'll all be okay if you wait it out and do exactly as you're told.

Originally Posted by Gabby GaGa

Refer to middle of thread. Observe my opinion proffessing that women only provide input, thus contolling the male. Controll the male, and still be unnaccountable. Sounds like a cushy deal.... Oh...wait...here come the the Feminazies!

Oh, the humour! Too much!

Originally Posted by Gabby GaGa

According to... a high school textbook? Again, see above answer concerning emotion controll.

Another helpless victim who thinks that they are better than the 'system'. You believe that schools are there for 'brainwashing', I bet. You wanna argue over what happened, please, be my guest, I have a ton of facts at the ready.

Originally Posted by Gabby GaGa

Very few apache women were warriors, with little evidence to sustain this. This was more of an amazonian myth combined witht he european perception of the "inferior and uncivalized native"
The europeans also recorded that a vast number of natives were regular cannibals.
Yeah, THAT turned out to be a correct assumption.

And yet,w ith this 'little evidence', you now know that they weren't violent? Stop contradicting yourself, Gabby.

[Jeanette X]

Originally Posted by Gabby GaGa

I
I don't really need full trust in my man. Trust = predictable, a crime I never hope my man to be guilty of. I want to wonder what he has waiting.

If you think that trusting someone means that you should be able to predict everything about them, then you have a very bizarre idea as to what trust is. Your relationships must be pretty fucked up.

Respect? I respect the man that has the 'nads to control my wild behavior.

Yes, nothing gains my respect faster than being pushed around by some big brute.

"SHUT UP BITCH!" *slap*

How can a girl help but be swept off her feet?

Observe my opinion proffessing that women only provide input, thus contolling the male.

Providing input=controlling and manipulating a person?

Controll the male, and still be unnaccountable. Sounds like a cushy deal....

Are you too much of a coward to be held accountable for anything? Is that why you want men to make all the decisions?

Very few apache women were warriors, with little evidence to sustain this. This was more of an amazonian myth combined witht he european perception of the "inferior and uncivalized native"

Once again, you have proven yourself to be a moron. If the women warrior thing was just another European assumption, then why haven't we ever heard about it in the stereotypes we see of native women? The popular image of the Native woman is that of the submissive squaw, not the strong warrior. And even if very few Apache women were warriors, the few examples that exist, and the fact that the tribal leaders (including Geronimo himself) embraced them, contradict your bizarre idea that pre-feminism women were utterly content to stay home and cook.
Examples for your reading pleasure:
http://books.google.com/books?vid=IS...IQ6zBk8edtRtr0

http://books.google.com/books?vid=IS...hIEpc#PPA29,M1

http://books.google.com/books?vid=IS...Yi8v92tAx_mNNY

Turn on the telivison and observe the floods of anti-imigration activists. And the paltery amount of people against it.

Because the media has no bias whatsover and would give equal voice to people who are pro-immigration.