Quote:
Originally Posted by Pentegarn
Well and good, but I'll be damned if I participate in giving the BCS championship any ratings when I no longer believe in the system as it is. I will watch the bowl games I think will be good, but if it determines the championship***** (that's one astrisk for each team that deserved a shot at it in the first place kids) I will not bother because it was a total fraud this year. Far too many teams have cause to bitch that they should have had a shot. That is a fundamentally flawed system, and "it's what we got" is a cop out. It will always be "what we got" till we stop looking at it. I think all the complaining doesn't work, but I am willing to bet a 1 share in the TV ratings would get their attention, and more importantly, the attention of the sponsors.
|
So you want people to just look away? Before the BCS, you had multiple national champions in any given year, and people still watched. You act like the BCS has ruined football. It's really not that different than what was there before. People didn't cry and boycott then, so to suggest that we all take up arms and turn off the boob tube is laughable. People get so worked up over the BCS that I think they fail to realize that at the end of the day, it's just only damn football.
I take it you didn't watch last year's title game then?
Quote:
|
I agree with all of that except the 8 BCS teams, maybe 6 BCS teams and 2 at large bids from any division for the tourney.
|
Agreed. I meant to say use the BCS rankings to determine the 8 playoff teams period.
Quote:
|
As for the SEC being the be all/end all of college football quality, they are not.
|
When did I say that? Sounds like someone still has a bitter taste in their mouth. Freudian slip?
By the way, you might want to add Clemsonx2, NC State, Wake Forestx2, Texas, Georgia Tech, Arizona State, and West Virginia to the SEC non-conference schedule.
Threaded Mode
