Go Back   I-Mockery Forum > I-Mockery Discussion Forums > Gaming 'n Toys
FAQ Members List Calendar Today's Posts

 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #10  
ChrisGlass ChrisGlass is offline
Ba-dum-tish. RIMSHOT!
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Los Angeles, CA
ChrisGlass is probably a spambot
Old Mar 10th, 2010, 08:58 PM       
Voxels really aren't the future. They're WAYY too processor heavy plus they fucking SUCK for animations. Polygon's strengths are in the fact it can bend as needed to reflect clothing, skin, water, waves, etc. You want to see what voxels are? Look up 3D Dot Game Heroes. A pretty cool game coming out soon, but think about it would handle animations on a large scale. It won't look natural.

This system is a bunch of single individual points. So it's fine for static geometry, but nothing else. (And anyways, polygon models are CONNECTED INDIVIDUAL POINTS)
It's the difference between Lego bricks for modeling versus K'Nex with meshes over the gaps for animating.

All the other ideas behind it are methods that 3D games already use, like culling off-screen/obscured objects and mipmapping. (Storing smaller versions of objects/textures to use when you don't need the detail)

The real future is just more shader code and terrain deformation.
Reply With Quote
 



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

   


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:48 AM.


© 2008 I-Mockery.com
Powered by: vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.